Is temperament a key to the success of teaching innovation?

Julia Blitz, Marietjie van Rooyen, David Cameron, Glynis Pickworth, Pieter du Toit


A section of the undergraduate curriculum was revised due to consistently poor student evaluation. The chosen didactic method for achieving this change was reciprocal peer teaching. This innovation may have required academic members of staff to adapt to a new teaching style.

Staff members determined their Keirsey temperament and were given a report on its interpretation. They participated in training on student-focused teaching techniques and completed the Approaches to Teaching Inventory (ATI) of their preferred approach to teaching. Their subsequent sessions with students were videotaped and analysed for features of student-focused, as opposed to teacher-focused teaching.

There was a link between temperament type and apparent delivery of student-focused teaching. Staff member’s perceptions of their approach to teaching did not correspond to their actual teaching behaviour.

Staff development strategies could take into account individual’s temperaments in order to direct their professional development for the full spectrum of flexible teaching skills. Alternatively teaching teams should be created in a way that takes account of different temperament types.

Temperament does play a key role in adaptation to innovation.

Authors' affiliations

Julia Blitz, Penang Medical College

Marietjie van Rooyen, University of Pretoria

David Cameron, University of Pretoria

Glynis Pickworth, University of Pretoria

Pieter du Toit, University of Pretoria

Full Text

PDF (376KB)


faculty development; temperament; student-focused teaching; teaching flexibility; innovation; Keirsey

Cite this article

African Journal of Health Professions Education 2010;2(1):17.

Article History

Date submitted: 2009-12-31
Date published: 2010-08-13

Article Views

Abstract views: 7634
Full text views: 10525

Comments on this article

*Read our policy for posting comments here